# Extensive Testing: API

- [ ]  Alle notwendigen Felder sind vorhanden und in richtigem Format (Linkfelder)
- [ ] Contract Type: postpaid
- [ ] Contract Type: adhoc
- [ ] Contract Type: hubject cpo
- [ ] Fabian Ringwald Use Case - 2 Entitäten User und Person
- [ ] Fetch Organization 
    - [ ] Adress, Contacts, Payment Terms available?
    - [ ] Organization Supplier
    - [ ] Organization Customer
    - [ ] Organization both
    - [ ] Related Contracts?
- [ ] Fetch Person 
    - [ ] Adress, Contacts, Payment Terms available?
    - [ ] Organization Supplier
    - [ ] Organization Customer
    - [ ] Organization both
    - [ ] Related Contracts?
- [ ] Fetch Employee 
    - [ ] linked Company correct?
- [ ] Supplier 177 
    - [ ] Contract Hubject 507
    - [ ] Contract Adhoc 117

Testing feedback:

- [ ] Payment Methods missing
- [ ] In case of person/organization should we link respective contracts to supplier and customer to differentiate? Currently the contract is linked to Party only if p/o is supplier. Example: [https://becharged.f.erpnext.com/app/gridware-party/GDW-P-000348](https://becharged.f.erpnext.com/app/gridware-party/GDW-P-000348)

Contracts:

- [ ] Authorizaton Contracts: The supplier is always becharged, which is wrong: [https://cloud.becharged.de/backoffice/contracts/275](https://cloud.becharged.de/backoffice/contracts/275) vs. [https://becharged.f.erpnext.com/app/gridware-contract/GWC-0000180](https://becharged.f.erpnext.com/app/gridware-contract/GWC-0000180)
- [ ] Contract Company Car:  
    [![image.png](https://becharged.phamos.eu/uploads/images/gallery/2026-05/scaled-1680-/jNJimage.png)](https://becharged.phamos.eu/uploads/images/gallery/2026-05/jNJimage.png)

\-->

- [x] Contract DocType improvements:

[![image.png](https://becharged.phamos.eu/uploads/images/gallery/2026-05/scaled-1680-/image.png)](https://becharged.phamos.eu/uploads/images/gallery/2026-05/image.png)

**--> Linkfield will be postponed**

- [x] Error Code occuring: Can we change this to "Contract already existing"

[![Screenshot 2026-05-15 at 08.37.27.png](https://becharged.phamos.eu/uploads/images/gallery/2026-05/scaled-1680-/screenshot-2026-05-15-at-08-37-27.png)](https://becharged.phamos.eu/uploads/images/gallery/2026-05/screenshot-2026-05-15-at-08-37-27.png)

Gridware Usage:

- [ ] **Time format**

[![Screenshot 2026-05-11 at 10.42.33.png](https://becharged.phamos.eu/uploads/images/gallery/2026-05/scaled-1680-/screenshot-2026-05-11-at-10-42-33.png)](https://becharged.phamos.eu/uploads/images/gallery/2026-05/screenshot-2026-05-11-at-10-42-33.png)

- [ ] **Re-calculation of wh to kwh -> Values are more like: decimal number (eleven point three five five not as eleven thousand three hundred fifty-five**
- [ ] **Use Case: Paying Customer vs. User**
- [ ] [![Screenshot 2026-05-11 at 11.15.04.png](https://becharged.phamos.eu/uploads/images/gallery/2026-05/scaled-1680-/screenshot-2026-05-11-at-11-15-04.png)](https://becharged.phamos.eu/uploads/images/gallery/2026-05/screenshot-2026-05-11-at-11-15-04.png)
- [ ] Sometimes there are a view usages missing per contract (always between 1-4)

Party Master:

- [ ] SEPA Mandates:
- [ ] [![image.png](https://becharged.phamos.eu/uploads/images/gallery/2026-05/scaled-1680-/Hz2image.png)](https://becharged.phamos.eu/uploads/images/gallery/2026-05/Hz2image.png)